1 Chronological events:
Ø 1968:
India refuses to sign the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) on the grounds
that it is discriminatory.
Ø May
18, 1974: India conducts its first nuclear test.
Ø March
10, 1978: US President Jimmy Carter signs the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act,
following which US ceases exporting nuclear assistance to India.
Ø May
11-13, 1998: India tests five underground nuclear tests.
Ø July
18, 2005: US President George W Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh first
announce their intention to enter into a nuclear agreement in Washington.
2 India-US Nuclear Deal (Also called 123 agreement)
Ø India
agreed to separate its civil and military nuclear facilities and to place all
its civil nuclear facilities under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
safeguards and, in exchange, the United States agreed to work toward full civil
nuclear cooperation with India.
Ø US-
Amended its domestic law, Atomic Energy Act of 1954, grant of an exemption for
India by the Nuclear Suppliers Group, an export-control cartel that had been
formed mainly in response to India's first nuclear test in 1974
Ø India
prepared separation plan for Civil Military Nuclear Separation, India-IAEA
safeguards (inspections) agreement and the
Ø The
implementation of this waiver made India the only known country with nuclear
weapons which is not a party to the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) but is still
allowed to carry out nuclear commerce with the rest of the world
3 Why India does not sign NPT:
Though
neither India, Israel, nor Pakistan have signed the NPT, India argues that
instead of addressing the central objective of universal and comprehensive
non-proliferation, the treaty creates a club of "nuclear haves" and a
larger group of "nuclear have-nots" by restricting the legal
possession of nuclear weapons to those states that tested them before 1967, who
alone are free to possess and multiply their nuclear stockpiles. India insists
on a comprehensive action plan for a nuclear-free world within a specific
time-frame and has also adopted a voluntary "no first use policy".
4 India’s Quest to International Groups:
The
Indian quest for membership to the four non-proliferation regimes - NSG,
Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), Wassenaar Arrangement and Australia
Group - took on a serious tone after the US President Barack Obama formally
committed US support to helping India get into these regimes, during his visit
to India in November, 2010.
However,
the NSG itself took a massive beating when China announced that it would
transfer two more nuclear reactors - Chashma III and IV - to Pakistan, without
bothering to go to the NSG for a waiver, like the US and India did for their
nuclear deal in 2008.
The
Chinese transfer went through the NSG, despite some dissenting voices, and
China actually got away with its "explanation" that these reactors
had been "grandfathered", in other words, signed before China acceded
to the NSG.
4.1 Missile Technology Control Regime:
The
Missile Technology Control Regime is an informal and voluntary association of
countries which share the goals of non-proliferation of unmanned delivery
systems capable of delivering weapons of mass destruction, and which seek to
coordinate national export licensing efforts aimed at preventing their
proliferation. The MTCR was originally established in 1987 by Canada, France,
Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States. Since that
time, the number of MTCR partners has increased to a total of thirty-four
countries, all of which have equal standing within the Regime.
4.2 The Wassenaar Arrangement:
The Wassenaar
Arrangement (full name: The Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls
for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies) is a multilateral
export control regime(MECR) with 41 participating states including many former
COMECON (Warsaw Pact) countries.
It
is the successor to the Cold war-era Coordinating Committee for
Multilateral Export Controls (COCOM), and was established on July 12, 1996, in
the Dutch town of Wassenaar, near The Hague. The Wassenaar
Arrangement is considerably less strict than COCOM, focusing primarily on the
transparency of national export control regimes and not granting veto power to
individual members over organizational decisions.
No comments:
Post a Comment